Newsgroups: comp.sources.d
Path: utzoo!utgpu!cunews!dgbt!rick.doc.ca!calvin.doc.ca!csr
From: csr@calvin.doc.ca (Andrew Patrick as CSR Moderator)
Subject: Re: v01INF1:  Status - Status of comp.sources.reviewed
Message-ID: <1991Apr14.030440.1814@rick.doc.ca>
Sender: news@rick.doc.ca
Nntp-Posting-Host: calvin.doc.ca
Organization: Communications Research Centre, Ottawa
References: <9418:Apr1121:48:4291@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> <19199@rpp386.cactus.org> <16831:Apr1306:25:0591@kramden.acf.nyu.edu>
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 1991 03:04:40 GMT
Lines: 21

In article <16831:Apr1306:25:0591@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> brnstnd@kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein) writes:

>The reviewers are still arguing even the most basic issues: anonymity
>and publication of reviews. Sure, they need to work privately to iron
>out details and write up appropriate guidelines and organize the group's
>first big review, but they should feel some responsibility towards the
>people who gave them a place to show some results.

Publication of the reviews has never been a point of discussion -- it
was included in the original charter, and nothing has changed.
Reviews will be published along with the software.

The anonymity of the reviewers has been discussed, with the result
being that reviewers will remain anonymous unless then wish to reveal
themselves.  This is what the reviewers wanted.


-- 
        Andrew Patrick acting as Comp.Sources.Reviewed Moderator
              Department of Communications, Ottawa, CANADA
                           csr@calvin.doc.CA