Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!olivea!isc-br!ewu!mpierce
From: mpierce@ewu.UUCP (Mathew Pierce)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Subject: Re: A3000UX vs. Sun Sparc
Message-ID: <1527@ewu.UUCP>
Date: 15 Apr 91 04:32:00 GMT
References: <44277@ut-emx.uucp> <0&1G2r9p1@cs.psu.edu>
Organization: Eastern Washington Univ. Cheney WA
Lines: 26

In article <0&1G2r9p1@cs.psu.edu>, melling@cs.psu.edu (Michael D Mellinger) writes:
> 
> In article <44277@ut-emx.uucp> sjk@ut-emx.uucp (bob) writes:
> 
>    So, can anyone start an intelligent debate comparing 3000UX (200MB
>    drive and 8+MB RAM) vs. bottom line Sparcstation? Forgive me if
>    this was done before, but I haven't seen it, yet. 
> 
> Why bother since the NeXT is a better deal than the bottom of the line
> Sparc?  

Read the bottom line sport, this is comp.sys.amiga.advocacy, not 
comp.sys.next.advocacy, there is your answer to the above, if you can't
figure it out, email me and I'll draw you a map.

>Now if you want to start comparing the NeXT to the Sparcs with
> the graphics accelatator then there might be something to talk about.

Naw, I would be interested in comparing the Amiga to the SPARC, maybe you
should get the nExt vs SPARC going in comp.sys.next, I'll read about it
there, honest.  

> 
> -Mike

Matt