Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ub!uhura.cc.rochester.edu!rochester!pt.cs.cmu.edu!o.gp.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!<UNAUTHENTICATED>+
From: Michael.Witbrock@cs.cmu.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Subject: Jesup vs NZ culture
Message-ID: <Ac2v0lW00XNI81OWob@cs.cmu.edu>
Date: 17 Apr 91 02:17:21 GMT
Organization: Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Lines: 29

Excerpts from netnews.soc.culture.australian: 16-Apr-91 RESULT:
soc.culture.new-ze.. Graeme Williams@daisy.wa (9760)

> The voting period for soc.culture.new-zealand closed at the end of
> Wed. 10th April.

> 244 valid votes were cast, 217 in favour and 27 against.

> Votes in favour exceed those against by over 100 and also comprise more
> than 2/3 of votes cast, so soc.culture.new-zealand passes.

> Thanks to all the people who voted. Votes in favour of this group
> originated from all over. In particular though considerable support
> came from Australia (from both genuine Aussies and ex-pat Kiwis), England
> and Finland.

> Valid votes were received from the following: 

> VOTES AGAINST (27)
> ...
> jesup@cbmvax.cbm.commodore.com (Randell Jesup)
> ...

> VOTES IN FAVOUR (217)
               ...

So, what've you got against newzild mate?
(apart from the fact that your name means something naughty there).
michael