Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!samsung!munnari.oz.au!bruce!trlluna!rhea!aduncan
From: aduncan@rhea.trl.oz (Allan Duncan)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.applications
Subject: Re: WorkBench 2.0
Message-ID: <3374@trlluna.trl.oz>
Date: 15 Apr 91 22:40:59 GMT
References: <20627@cbmvax.commodore.com>
Sender: news@trlluna.trl.oz
Lines: 12

From article <20627@cbmvax.commodore.com>, by jesup@cbmvax.commodore.com (Randell Jesup):
> 
> Also note that a fair number of A500's don't have the address lines in the
> same spot as current roms/eproms usually do - they weren't available at the
> design time and someone had to guess, I think.  There are several solutions

I thought Intel doing their own thing again was the prob., or was that
the 256K ROM/EPROM-are-different problem?
Allan Duncan	ACSnet	a.duncan@trl.oz
(+613) 541 6708	ARPA	a.duncan%trl.oz.au@uunet.uu.net
		UUCP	{uunet,hplabs,ukc}!munnari!trl.oz.au!a.duncan
Telecom Research Labs, PO Box 249, Clayton, Victoria, 3168, Australia.