Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!hplabs!hpfcso!hpfcdc!koren
From: koren@hpfcdc.HP.COM (Steve Koren)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.graphics
Subject: Re: QRT vs. DKB 2.10
Message-ID: <33770003@hpfcdc.HP.COM>
Date: 15 Apr 91 19:21:26 GMT
References: <frank.3740@morpheus.UUCP>
Organization: HP Fort Collins, Co.
Lines: 16


> Given a couple of machines, PRT will blow either of them away :)
> Personally, I'm very fond of both QRT and DKB.  I am so glad that there are
> people out there that are using YACC/BISON/LEX/FLEX to produce better
> input languages to programs (something RayShade 3.0 was SERIOUSLY lacking 

QRT doesn't use yacc or lex.  (I happen to know this 'cuz I wrote it :-) )

As for features, I think DKB wins hands down.  QRT was OK back when I
was working on it, but has since been passed up by pretty much
everything else.  Oh well :-)

  - steve

PS - QRT will run significantly faster (over 2x) if you compile it with
Lattice C, and much faster yet if you compile an '882 version.