Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!ccwf.cc.utexas.edu
From: daveh@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (David H. Huang)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Subject: Re: AE Ramfactor Troubles
Message-ID: <47199@ut-emx.uucp>
Date: 15 Apr 91 14:38:30 GMT
References: <8606@crash.cts.com>
Sender: news@ut-emx.uucp
Reply-To: daveh@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (David H. Huang)
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin
Lines: 23

In article <8606@crash.cts.com> root@crash.cts.com (Bill Blue) writes:
>You may want to check with Applied Engineering concerning the speed of the
>chips that your Ramfactor came with. When I first received mine, I
>experienced the same problems and found that the chips on the card should
>have been 15 ns chips and not 12 ns chips. When I returned the card and had
>the chips replaced with the correct chips, everything worked fine and has
>worked fine for nearly three years.

That's strange... I didn't think that using faster chips would do any
harm to anything (although using slower ones might). Is this a
Ramfactor specific type of problem? I've got 80 ns SIMMs in my GS, and
I've had absolutely no problems. BTW, you probably mean 150 and 120 ns
chips, not 15 and 12...

>ProLine:  genie@pro-magic
>Internet: genie@pro-magic.cts.com
>UUCP:     crash!pro-magic!genie
>ARPA:     crash!pro-magic!genie@nosc.mil
-- 
David Huang                              |   "Calzoni Pizza:
Internet: daveh@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu       |       Delivery in six
UUCP: ..!ut-emx!ccwf.cc.utexas.edu!daveh |       hours, or else your
America Online: DrWho29                  |       pizza is cold."