Xref: utzoo comp.sys.atari.8bit:4712 comp.sys.atari.st:37229 comp.sys.apple2:14582 alt.bbs:5040 Path: utzoo!utgpu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!mintaka!spdcc!tauxersvilli!alphalpha!nazgul From: nazgul@alphalpha.com (Kee Hinckley) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.8bit,comp.sys.atari.st,comp.sys.apple2,alt.bbs Subject: Re: BBS Programs Message-ID: <1991Apr15.024149.24710@alphalpha.com> Date: 15 Apr 91 02:41:49 GMT References: Organization: asi Lines: 23 In article root@prk.UUCP (Phillip Keen) writes: >I am in the process of getting either an Atari 8-bit, an Atari ST, or an Apple >// system to run my BBS on. I have decided to go this route rather than >upgrading for it is much cheaper. However, I do realize the consequences of Without question the best BBS I have ever seen - on any system, is Morgan Davis' ProLine system for the Apple II. I run it on a IIe suped up with an 8mhz zip chip. It runs for weeks sometime without my paying any attention to it. It supports Usenet newsfeeds and outside email connections, the software upgrades arrive electronicly via remote copies, the code is almost all in AppleSoft basic, which makes bug fixes and additiions relatively straightforward. And to top it off the environment includes a large portion of Unix-style commands and a cshell subset. You can get more info from mdavis@pro-sol.cts.com (...crash!pnet01!pro-sol!mdavis). -- Alfalfa Software, Inc. | Poste: The EMail for Unix nazgul@alfalfa.com | Send Anything... Anywhere 617/646-7703 (voice/fax) | info@alfalfa.com I'm not sure which upsets me more: that people are so unwilling to accept responsibility for their own actions, or that they are so eager to regulate everyone else's.