Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!rice!uncle-bens.rice.edu!bgr From: bgr@uncle-bens.rice.edu (Robert G. Rhode) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Re: Graphics on the STE - v. generally speaking... Message-ID: <1991Apr16.211304.6829@rice.edu> Date: 16 Apr 91 21:13:04 GMT References: <1991Apr3.051045.1894@ns.network.com> <1991Apr03.150135.26529@chinet.chi.il.us> <40922@cup.portal.com> <1991Apr5.231704.19657@jato.jpl.nasa.gov> <1563@ipsi.UUCP> <1991Apr16.192259.4357@rice.edu> Sender: news@rice.edu (News) Followup-To: comp.sys.atari.st Organization: Rice University Lines: 43 In article <1991Apr16.192259.4357@rice.edu>, bgr@uncle-bens.rice.edu (Robert G. Rhode) writes: > In article <1563@ipsi.UUCP>, wallmann@ipsi.UUCP (Georg Wallmann) writes: > > > always came up with "too expensive". Of course if you think 16 MB isn't > > expensive ... as you do in your post. While thinking about it I > > had this great idea for a new RAM technology, which unfortunately > > (then unbeknownst to me) already existed as dual-port RAM. Even then the > > bus width needed and the cycle speed is just about too ridicolous for > > a home computer. Personally I'd be happy with 640*400*16bit colors at > > 70Hz and some hires in mono. That would be monetarily feasible, I only > > want color for the games anyway, and some hires for programming. > > I think I can (theoretically) offer you a better deal: > > How about 1024x1024x24-bit color for <$350 parts cost (if you are an OEM)... > > Ingredients: > 24 1-Megabit Video Rams @ ~$12 each => 3 MB > 1 Brooktree triple 8-bit RAMDAC @ ~@50 > glue logic > > 1024x1024x70 Hz = 110 MHz pixel clock. > Each VRAM is 256Kx4, so each VRAM needs to output at 27.5 MHz. > A 100-ns VRAM is rated to shift out serial information at the rate of 33 MHz. > 1 VRAM chip per bitplane. > > A VRAM is a dual-ported RAM with a DRAM half and a serial shift register half. > The two halves are completely independent of one another except when passing data > between them. 512 bits (1 DRAM row) is transferred at a time. > > Anyway, I am currently doing a theoretical video board design for a senior EE class, > and I assure you that the performance you require is not at all unreasonable in cost. > > - Bob > Silly me, I forgot to tell it the right distribution. By the way, that should say Brooktree VideoDAC, not RAMDAC. A RAMDAC is what you use when you want to have a 256-color lookup table for 8-bit graphics. The Bt459 RAMDAC has a 256x24 lookup table for color information, 16x24 overlay color lookup table for easy text-over-graphics or windowing applications, and even a 64x64x3-color cursor in hardware (For those of you who want a sprite). I hope this reaches more than just me this time...