Xref: utzoo comp.music:3124 comp.sys.atari.st:37349
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!rice!uupsi!sunic!news.funet.fi!funic!santra!saha.hut.fi!s37837k
From: s37837k@saha.hut.fi (Jari Lehto)
Newsgroups: comp.music,comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: Cubase information sought
Message-ID: <1991Apr18.231854.18061@santra.uucp>
Date: 18 Apr 91 23:18:54 GMT
References: <1991Apr17.165104@disuns2.epfl.ch>
Sender: news@santra.uucp (Cnews - USENET news system)
Reply-To: s37837k@saha.hut.fi (Jari Lehto)
Organization: Helsinki University of Technology, FINLAND
Lines: 27

In article <1991Apr17.165104@disuns2.epfl.ch> choueiry@disuns2.epfl.ch (Berthe Yazid Choueiry) writes:
>Hi,
>I am posting this for a friend, so please send replies 
>to choueiry@liasun1.epfl.ch. I shall transmit. Thanks.
>--------------------------------------------------------
>
>I am looking to buy a portable atari stacy (model 1 or 2)
>in order to make use of cubase, but how does this stand 
>up to todays competition- I heard its still the best, is
>this true ?

I think Cubase is still the best, 2.0 is absolutely great.
But C-Lab's Notator is quite close...

Remember, Cubase needs a lot of RAM and a harddisk is preferred!

>Is there something comparable available for the macintosh?

Sure is, but not really anything that could *clearly* beat Cubase.
And portable Mac + MIDI-software (the level you seek) may well cost
much more than Stacy + Cubase.

				Jartsu

*									*
*		Nothing yet, but I'll keep on scanning...		*
*		^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^			*