Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!sdd.hp.com!hp-pcd!hpfcso!hplabs!hpcc05!hpsciz!hpdtczb!rog
From: rog@hpdtczb.HP.COM (Roger Haaheim)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp
Subject: Re: HP bias's
Message-ID: <2190010@hpdtczb.HP.COM>
Date: 15 Apr 91 15:24:35 GMT
References: <1991Apr13.011054.15941@sura.net>
Organization: HP Design Tech Center - Santa Clara, CA
Lines: 16

=-> / hpdtczb:comp.sys.hp / nick@sura.net (Nick Lemberos) /  5:10 pm  Apr 12, 1991 /
=-> 
=-> This is not the only example I have seen in the last week.  It is getting 
=-> pretty bad.  It makes a difference if the opinions expressed are coming
=-> from employees of the same company.  Since this is comp.sys.HP, how about HP
=-> employees making it REAL clear whose opinion they state.
=-> 
=->                          nick
=-> nick@umuc.umd.edu
=-> These are MY comments.
=-> ----------

I guess I don't understand your request.  Whenever I post anything to any
notesstring, it's pretty obvious who I am and who I work for.  Perhaps an
IMHO should be attached?  I tend to assume everything is the opinion of
the writer.  Shouldn't I?