Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!ncar!unmvax!uokmax!d.cs.okstate.edu!ong From: ong@d.cs.okstate.edu (ONG ENG TENG) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware Subject: Re: Loop Omnisync non-interlaced monitors (anyone have one?) Message-ID: <1991Apr16.201424.6318@d.cs.okstate.edu> Date: 16 Apr 91 20:14:24 GMT References: <28046@uflorida.cis.ufl.EDU> Organization: Oklahoma State University Lines: 29 From article <28046@uflorida.cis.ufl.EDU>, by jdb@reef.cis.ufl.edu (Brian K. W. Hook): > It's a shame you couldn't get the Goldstar or the Samsung big monitors, > since they seem to be a good deal. I know that the Goldstar monitors that > I have seen have been pretty inferior, Well, if you have a source of Goldstar monitor (who does not say during order time that they are out of stock), I am sure many of us could use it. Goldstar was my first choice, except I called around for 2 hours during that morning and NOBODY has stock. I even called the Goldstar company, but they gave me the runaround. Even if you have a Samsung 17" source, it would also be useful. Against nobody carries it the day I decided to order. I had to "settled" for Swan VGA15, which turns out to be a better deal in some respect as the Goldstar and the Samsung (I especially like the flatscreen effect of Swan VGA15, the Goldstar and Samsung does not mention anything about flatscreen). I had since tried to find out who Swan OEMed the VGA15 from but to no avail. My guess is that it is a new design hence probably a better design (technology-wise) than Goldstar and Samsung (whose 16" and 17" has been around for a while). Please correct me if I am wrong. Also, somebody who email me yesterday was confused about using noninterlaced program on interlaced monitor. You cannot do that. I am sorry I could not reply email to him because I cannot comprehen the return email address. In my comparison, I was comparing 1024x768x256 interlaced on a Daewood (14" interlaced $349 from HDI) to 1024x768x256 noninterlaced on my Swan VGA15.