Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!sun-barr!newstop!sun!amdcad!brahms!phil
From: phil@brahms.amd.com (Phil Ngai)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Re: Caching and VGA (was: Comparing 486 to 386 Systems)
Message-ID: <1991Apr18.192814.21504@amd.com>
Date: 18 Apr 91 19:28:14 GMT
References: <1991Apr6.045408.15395@agate.berkeley.edu> <1991Apr7.170017.23962@news.cs.indiana.edu> <1991Apr7.232941.21382@agate.berkeley.edu> <1991Apr8.154643.784@saturn.uucp> <1991Apr18.030753.6037@cc.helsinki.fi>
Sender: usenet@amd.com (NNTP Posting)
Organization: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Lines: 8

osmoviita@cc.helsinki.fi writes:
>How does VGA (SuperVGA) etc. suffer from caching? 

If you cache writes, then the cache grabs the write and
the VGA card doesn't get it.

--
	The best way to preserve your RKBA is to vote Libertarian.