Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!news.nd.edu!mentor.cc.purdue.edu!noose.ecn.purdue.edu!en.ecn.purdue.edu!stevew
From: stevew@en.ecn.purdue.edu (Steven L Wootton)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: DR-DOS - Multitasking
Keywords: DR-DOS, DRI, Multitasking OS
Message-ID: <1991Apr16.144553.113@en.ecn.purdue.edu>
Date: 16 Apr 91 14:45:53 GMT
References: <78753@bu.edu.bu.edu> <1991Apr12.155324.26621@compu.com> <AYQ16Z5@dri.com>
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
Lines: 22

In article <AYQ16Z5@dri.com> frotz@dri.com writes:
>fred@compu.com (Fred Rump) writes:
>]rem@buitc.bu.edu (Robert Mee) writes:
>]>I read in an article in Infoworld (early April) about a product from
>]>Digital Research that is a multitasking (and multi-user) version of DR-DOS.
>]        On order for eval.
>
>	I have heard about this too.  I can say that the new Multi-User DOS
>is not FlexOS (a real-time protected mode OS from us).  What I can't say has
>to be posed as a question:  What other Multi-tasking/Multi-user systems have
>we released over the years and what are the impressions/possibilities of
>Multi-User DOS being a derivative/direct descendant of one of these...:-?

Wow, MP/M for the PC!  :-)

So whatever happened to Concurrent DOS, anyway?  It got pretty good
reviews for a while, and then seemed to vanish.

Steve Wootton
stevew@ecn.purdue.edu
stevew@pur-ee.uucp
stevew%ecn.purdue.edu@purccvm.bitnet