Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!uunet!drivax!frotz
From: frotz@dri.com (Frotz)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: DR-DOS - Multitasking
Keywords: DR-DOS, DRI, Multitasking OS
Message-ID: <WDT1H5Z@dri.com>
Date: 17 Apr 91 19:27:13 GMT
References: <78753@bu.edu.bu.edu> <1991Apr12.155324.26621@compu.com> <AYQ16Z5@dri.com> <1991Apr16.144553.113@en.ecn.purdue.edu>
Sender: frotz@dri.com
Reply-To: frotz@dri.com
Organization: Digital Research, Monterey CA/USA or none (see also My_Desk)
Lines: 19

stevew@en.ecn.purdue.edu (Steven L Wootton) writes:
]In article <AYQ16Z5@dri.com> frotz@dri.com writes:
]>	I have heard about this too.  I can say that the new Multi-User DOS
]>is not FlexOS (a real-time protected mode OS from us).  What I can't say has
]>to be posed as a question:  What other Multi-tasking/Multi-user systems have
]>we released over the years and what are the impressions/possibilities of
]>Multi-User DOS being a derivative/direct descendant of one of these...:-?

]Wow, MP/M for the PC!  :-)

	;-);-)

]So whatever happened to Concurrent DOS, anyway?  It got pretty good
]reviews for a while, and then seemed to vanish.

All I have to say is:
	;-> ;-> ;-> ;-> ;-> ;-> ;-> ;-> ;-> ;-> ;-> ;->
--
Frotz