Xref: utzoo comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc:8610 comp.sys.laptops:2533 gnu.misc.discuss:2836 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!mintaka!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!mcsun!ukc!edcastle!edcogsci!cogsci!miles From: miles@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Miles Bader) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc,comp.sys.laptops,gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Re: Freemacs or MG2a or Epsilon? Message-ID: Date: 14 Apr 91 12:16:04 GMT References: <1991Apr10.164029.8489@odin.corp.sgi.com> Sender: miles@cogsci.ed.ac.uk Organization: HCRC, University of Edinburgh Lines: 19 In-reply-to: phr@lightning.Berkeley.EDU's message of 13 Apr 91 11:30:47 GMT phr@lightning.Berkeley.EDU (Paul Rubin) writes: > To the person who asks whether Epsilon's default keybindings are > messed up (i.e. "improved" from Emacs's): yes, they, are, but not too > badly. JOVE messes them up considerably more. MG tries to remain > faithful, though they messed up in a few places too, sometimes by > accident. Actually, epsilon does an incredible job of picking the best keybindings from both the original emacs and gosling's emacs-- by far the best default set I've ever used. None of this ``We must follow the holy bindings chosen by RMS'' shit. [Note that the last version of epsilon I used was something like 1.0x... At the time, I used Twenex emacs a lot more than Gosling's.] -Miles -- -- Miles Bader -- HCRC, University of Edinburgh -- Miles.Bader@ed.ac.uk