Xref: utzoo comp.windows.ms:11543 comp.sys.novell:1169 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!mips!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!caen!ox.com!math.fu-berlin.de!fauern!unido!opal!db0tui11!muhrth From: MUHRTH@tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de (Thomas Muhr) Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms,comp.sys.novell Subject: Re: Windows on diskless workstations Message-ID: <91106.083943MUHRTH@DB0TUI11.BITNET> Date: 16 Apr 91 06:39:43 GMT References: <1991Apr13.223145.21978@newsserver.sfu.ca> Organization: Technical University Berlin Lines: 34 In article <1991Apr13.223145.21978@newsserver.sfu.ca>, rhone@newsserver.sfu.ca (Brock Rhone) says: > >Does anyone out there have experience with Windows 3.0 on >diskless workstations? > >We will be installing a small ARCnet LAN: 5 workstations and a >dedicated server running Novell ELS II. Three of the workstations >would be diskless 25MHz 386DXs with 4MB RAM. > >I have heard that Windows' performance on a diskless station is >seriously degraded. How serious would the performance hit be on >a small (and fairly lightly loaded) network like this? In enhanced mode all swapping will use the net. Imagine a 8 Mbyte swapfile rushing through the ethernet cables form every workstation running windows! >The alternative to the diskless stations is to buy 20MHz 386SXs >with 40MB drives -- a slower processor but a local hard disk >included for roughly the same price. This is extremely better, because a permanent swapfile can be generated for every workstation, leaving the net bandwidth for the essential tasks. I have posted an article recently describing the very tricky procedure to install windows in a net efficiently (space, speed). >Is this the better option? Yes >Thanks for any help. > >Brock You're welcome - Thomas ------- Thomas Muhr, Technical University of Berlin, BITNET: muhrth@db0tui11 Project ATLAS - Computer Based Tools for Qualitative Research "Computers, like every technology, are a vehicle for the transformation of tradition." (WINOGRAD/FLORES)