Newsgroups: comp.text.desktop Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!batcomputer!cornell!uw-beaver!june.cs.washington.edu!graham From: graham@june.cs.washington.edu (Stephen Graham) Subject: Re: UNIX desktop pub. Message-ID: <1991Apr18.210211.6559@beaver.cs.washington.edu> Keywords: Interleaf, Frame?, compare Sender: news@beaver.cs.washington.edu (USENET News System) Organization: Computer Science & Engineering, U. of Washington, Seattle References: <2325@abcom.ATT.COM> <1991Apr18.173625.16895@wam.umd.edu> Date: Thu, 18 Apr 91 21:02:11 GMT In article <1991Apr18.173625.16895@wam.umd.edu> mikec@wam.umd.edu (Michael D. Callaghan) writes: [request for comparison of FrameMaker and Interleaf. Follow-up message urging use of NeXT.] > >Also, Frame costs $995 retail, $495 edu for the NeXT. If you get it for >the Sun, you have to pay over $1000 per YEAR for the license! Not good. Amazing. And I just paid $100 for my educational FrameMaker license for a SPARCstation. Just amaaaaazing. Also, bozo, try to remember that the original post may have been from someone who ALREADY HAS A SUN NETWORK. No, they don't want to investigate a NeXT. They want to use what they've already got, thank you. (Computer brand fanatics really piss me off.) -- Steve Graham graham@isis.ee.washington.edu (206) 543-8115