Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!bionet!agate!ucbvax!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!mcsun!hp4nl!fwi.uva.nl!smagt
From: smagt@fwi.uva.nl (Patrick van der Smagt)
Newsgroups: comp.text.tex
Subject: Re: MuTeX and multiple staffs + beams.
Message-ID: <1991Apr17.115004.18065@fwi.uva.nl>
Date: 17 Apr 91 11:50:04 GMT
References: <KARL.91Apr16134545@apple-gunkies.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
Sender: news@fwi.uva.nl
Distribution: comp
Organization: FWI, University of Amsterdam
Lines: 13
Nntp-Posting-Host: wendy.fwi.uva.nl

karl@apple-gunkies.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Karl Berry) writes:

>MuTeX's major limitation (at first glance) is that it can only typeset
>single-staff music.  I'm interested in hearing about any work on
>extending MuTeX to multiple-staff music (even two would be a big
>improvement!), or, indeed, from anyone who has tried to use MuTeX at
>all.  Or about alternatives to MuTeX.  Or whatever.

Please post anything you get.  But...there's more wrong.
Trying to live within MuTeX's limitations, I don't understand why it can
print only 1/8 beams!  I REALLY need 1/16 beams; can it be extended?

					Patrick van der Smagt