Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix Path: utzoo!utgpu!dennis From: dennis@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca (Dennis Ferguson) Subject: Re: malloc (was: making a request to IBM) Message-ID: <1991Apr17.021857.10307@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca> Keywords: malloc psalloc paging space Organization: none References: <1991Apr9.024814.1141@appmag.com> <6644@awdprime.UUCP> <1991Apr14.030748.18052@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca> <6670@awdprime.UUCP> Date: Wed, 17 Apr 1991 02:18:57 GMT In article <6670@awdprime.UUCP> jfh@greenber.austin.ibm.com (John F Haugh II) writes: >In article <1991Apr14.030748.18052@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca> dennis@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca (Dennis Ferguson) writes: >>I'm old enough to have used vanilla Version 7 Unix when PDP-11s were in >>vogue, and to be brutally frank the only Unix I can remember using >>which panic'd when it ran out of memory was an early AIX on an RT, a system >>which I hardly think qualifies as The Definitive Unix. > >UNIX v7 would panic if it ran out of swap space, as would System III, >4.0, 5.0, and every swapping UNIX AT&T released. The PDP-11/45 I >learned UNIX on seldom panic'd because it seldom had the load needed >to run out of swap space. Other v7-based systems, such as Microsoft's >original Xenix, would run on machines which were capable of being >overloaded to the point of running out of swap space. I regularly >saw a client's MC68000-based Xenix system run out of swap space. It >had 768K RAM and 2MB of swap. This is indeed correct, certainly as far as V7 (and V6, for that matter) is concerned (we have those on line). I should have looked before leaping. I do note, however, that the oldest BSD source we have around (4.1, circa 1981) doesn't panic, nor does the oldest AT&T source (System V release 1? Files are all dated February, 1985). This is not a problem which was only recently fixed. >This is not to serve an as excuse for any vendor's kernel bloat or >utility creeping featurism, but rather to simply point out that if >you use more than what you have, you will always see some bizarre >behavior, and always have seen same. This is very true. Dennis Ferguson University of Toronto