Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!news.nd.edu!mentor.cc.purdue.edu!aru
From: aru@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Sri-Man)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga
Subject: Re: What version of SVR4 is 1.1?
Message-ID: <10734@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>
Date: 18 Apr 91 16:33:57 GMT
Article-I.D.: mentor.10734
References: <1991Apr15.211314.4989@digibd.com> <2535@urbana.mcd.mot.com>
Reply-To: aru@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Sri-Man)
Distribution: na
Organization: Purdue University
Lines: 13

In article <2535@urbana.mcd.mot.com> dfields@urbana.mcd.mot.com writes:
>In article <1991Apr15.211314.4989@digibd.com>, rhealey@digibd.com (Rob
>Healey) writes:
>|>
>|>	Is Amiga UNIX 1.1 R4 version 1.0 or R4 version 2.0? I.e. does it have
>|>	the fixes and "enhancements" that were in version 2.0 of the
>|>	UNIX source? Do 386 and M68k version numbers mean the same thing?

You know, I think MIT (people who made X right?) is already started on 
Xwindows version 5.  Think that Commodore might just scrape R4 and come out
wtih R5 instead, so that it will have it before anybody else?

	Sri