Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!olivea!samsung!rex!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ncar!ico!rcd
From: rcd@ico.isc.com (Dick Dunn)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: ESIX (and other) SVR4
Summary: eh?
Message-ID: <1991Apr17.214234.27954@ico.isc.com>
Date: 17 Apr 91 21:42:34 GMT
References: <1332.28096bc1@sleepy.bmd.trw.com> <1991Apr17.013415.23930@NCoast.ORG>
Organization: Interactive Systems Corporation, Boulder, CO
Lines: 12

allbery@NCoast.ORG (Brandon S. Allbery KB8JRR/AA) writes:

> SCO apparently doesn't want SVR4.  I suspect they're going to be in for a
> rather rude awakening....

You might want to re-think that in context of the ACE "alliance".  One can
argue whether it's good, or wise, or whether it will succeed, but they seem
to have something in mind.  (I.e., they didn't just blow off V.4 with no
other plan in mind.)
-- 
Dick Dunn     rcd@ico.isc.com -or- ico!rcd       Boulder, CO   (303)449-2870
   ...While you were reading this, Motif grew by another kilobyte.