Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!nstar!larry
From: larry@nstar.rn.com (Larry Snyder)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: ESIX (and other) SVR4
Message-ID: <1991Apr18.195832.2069@nstar.rn.com>
Date: 18 Apr 91 19:58:32 GMT
References: <1332.28096bc1@sleepy.bmd.trw.com> <1991Apr17.013415.23930@NCoast.ORG> <1991Apr17.214234.27954@ico.isc.com>
Organization: NSTAR BBS Indiana's LARGEST BBS 219-289-0287
Lines: 17

rcd@ico.isc.com (Dick Dunn) writes:

>You might want to re-think that in context of the ACE "alliance".  One can
>argue whether it's good, or wise, or whether it will succeed, but they seem
>to have something in mind.  (I.e., they didn't just blow off V.4 with no
>other plan in mind.)

I was told that they (SCO) are the standard and that they (again SCO)
will decide what will be the operating system of choice in the future.

They (SCO) feel that SVR4 is to buggy at present - and they have no
interest in it.

-- 
   Larry Snyder, NSTAR Public Access Unix 219-289-0287 (HST/PEP/V.32/v.42bis)
                        regional UUCP mapping coordinator 
               {larry@nstar.rn.com, ..!uunet!nstar.rn.com!larry}