Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!paperboy!hsdndev!cmcl2!adm!smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: Ware Ware Wizardjin
Message-ID: <15850@smoke.brl.mil>
Date: 16 Apr 91 02:20:33 GMT
References: <9104081805.AA14112@samadams.Princeton.EDU> <63660@bbn.BBN.COM> <1991Apr12.233838.27407@cbnewsh.att.com>
Organization: U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory, APG, MD.
Lines: 5

In article <1991Apr12.233838.27407@cbnewsh.att.com> wcs@cbnewsh.att.com (Bill Stewart 908-949-0705 erebus.att.com!wcs) writes:
>military systems ALWAYS have cost overruns

While a lot of your points were valid, it is not true that all military
procurements have cost overruns.  I would wager that most do not.