Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!cunixf.cc.columbia.edu!rs54 From: rs54@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Richard Sucgang) Newsgroups: sci.bio Subject: Re: Reconstructing cells from DNA Message-ID: <1991Apr16.235422.20331@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> Date: 16 Apr 91 23:54:22 GMT Organization: Columbia University Lines: 31 In article <1991Apr14.211248.2072@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca> mroussel@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca (Marc Roussel) writes: >In article <1991Apr13.203239.22379@hollie.rdg.dec.com> >winalski@psw.enet.dec.com (Paul S. Winalski) writes: >>I don't think that there are any cases of non-nucleic-acid-based hereditary >>mechanisms in any known organisms. Such mechanisms might be possible, but >>living organisms don't make use of them. > > I don't think that right, unless you want to extend the meaning of >"hereditary mechanisms" to the point of meaninglessness. Most >biological morphogenesis in multi-celled organisms is now known to be >the result of complex spatio-temporal interactions (chemical waves and the like) >between embryo gene products and the chemical environment provided by >the egg and/or uterus. The number of digits that a person (or other >mammal) develops is now known to be determined by chemical waves at >certain stages of development rather than by direct coding. (I'm afraid >that I can't produce any references at the moment due to a library >strike at the University of Toronto.) > > Marc R. Roussel > mroussel@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca I take it you refer to the Turing models of pattern formation. The problem is, what encodes for the source and sinks of the gradient? This is still a genetic factor. In drosophila, for example, proper morphogenesis is dependent on how the maternal RNA is distributed in the initial embryo. That remains quite essentially, genetic. -rich Richard Sucgang : Dept. of Anatomy and Cell Biology Columbia University (sucgang@cuhhca.hhmi.columbia.edu; de slime god rs54@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu)