Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!batcomputer!cornell!uw-beaver!milton!ogicse!zephyr.ens.tek.com!tektronix!percy!m2xenix!quagga!ucthpx!oct1!cside1!kuyper
From: kuyper@cside1.uucp (Kuyper Hoffman)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans
Subject: Re: PCroute License Requirement
Message-ID: <1991Apr15.052705.2268@cside1.uucp>
Date: 15 Apr 91 05:27:05 GMT
Article-I.D.: cside1.1991Apr15.052705.2268
References: <91086.144020P85025@BARILVM.BITNET> <1991Apr01.165051.4039@oetl1.scf.lmsc.lockheed.com> <40986@cup.portal.com> <452@frcs.UUCP>
Reply-To: kuyper@cside1.UUCP (Kuyper Hoffman)
Organization: SCS-Cside1
Lines: 17

In article <452@frcs.UUCP> paul@frcs.UUCP (Paul Nash) writes:
>Don't try to persuade people using PCroute that they have to pay you 
>money -- they don't!  They only have to keep using the current (non-
>commercial) versions.

Especially since some of the newer versions don't match good ole
version 2.1.  I had problems with the Beta Release of 2.2 when used
as an IPX/TCP router.  It simply doesn't work, but simply replacing
the .EXE file with pktpkt2.1 (ie no change to the config file) works
great.  Anyone else had this?  What's the latest NON-commercial
release?
-- 
|      Kuyper Hoffman                   |  Life is just a bowl of All-Bran |
|  kuyper@cside1.UUCP                   |  You wake up every morning       |
|  ....!ddsw1!olsa99!oct1!cside1!kuyper |  And it's there....              |
\--------------------------------------/ \--------------------------------/