Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!emory!gatech!panther!mays
From: mays@panther.gatech.edu (Dick Mays)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans
Subject: Re: Netware vs. Lantastic, sigh...
Message-ID: <1275@mephisto.edu>
Date: 22 Apr 91 17:35:15 GMT
References: <29323@rouge.usl.edu>
Sender: news@gatech.edu
Reply-To: mays@panther.UUCP (Dick Mays)
Lines: 22

> The Compuad salesperson came back and said, quote
>   'Artisoft is only going to start supporting their own network 
>    cards, i.e. upgrades won't be made available to my WD cards!!???
>   '
>What? I said.  This is foolish, don't you think so?

I have no experience with Lantastic, and fail to understand the
attraction.  Could someone with some knowledge of this NOS
explain the benefits of this NOS, (and, or problems).

I understand that peer networking is provided, how much RAM
is taken from the DOS environment.  Is the product Windows 
compatible in protected or virtual 386 mode?

Comments appreciated.

-- Dick Mays

MAYS, RICHARD CHAPMAN
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta Georgia, 30332
uucp:	  ...!{decvax,hplabs,ncar,purdue,rutgers}!gatech!sybil!mays    
Internet: mays@cc.gatech.edu