Xref: utzoo rec.arts.sf-lovers:58521 rec.arts.fine:284 comp.editors:3050 comp.text:8297 rec.arts.books:21073 rec.arts.poems:11616 bit.listserv.literary:583 alt.prose:997 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!umich!vela!rjohnson From: rjohnson@vela.acs.oakland.edu (R o d Johnson) Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf-lovers,rec.arts.fine,comp.editors,comp.text,rec.arts.books,rec.arts.poems,bit.listserv.literary,alt.prose Subject: Re: What do writers want from a word processor? Message-ID: <6046@vela.acs.oakland.edu> Date: 21 Apr 91 17:00:51 GMT References: <_FTARF9@xds13.ferranti.com> <1991Apr21.051427.14547@agate.berkeley.edu> Followup-To: comp.editors,comp.text Organization: Storefront Witchdoctors Lines: 14 If y'all are just going to engage in the usual arguments about which is your favorite editor, would you please edit your Newsgroups: line? This thread may have been marginally relevant to rec.arts.books, .fine, .sf-lovers, .poems, bit.listserv.literary and alt.prose when it was still about what writers need in a word processor (though I doubt it)--but now that it's degenerated to one of the longest smoldering peat fires on the net, it's time to get it out of the literary groups. When something is cross-posted as widely as this is, the original author should set Followup-To:, but since he didn't do us the courtesy, could the rest of you? Thanks. -- Rod Johnson * rjohnson@vela.acs.oakland.edu * (313) 650 2315 "Poetry ends like a rope" --Jack Spicer