Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!spool.mu.edu!news.nd.edu!mentor.cc.purdue.edu!mace.cc.purdue.edu!nvi
From: nvi@mace.cc.purdue.edu (Charles C. Allen)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.smalltalk
Subject: Re: Access methods - New feature ?
Keywords: Access methods, Smalltalk-80
Message-ID: <7294@mace.cc.purdue.edu>
Date: 22 Apr 91 16:53:20 GMT
References: <1991Apr21.221149.8057@vuse.vanderbilt.edu> <2270@media03.UUCP>
Organization: Purdue University
Lines: 8

Actually, I think being able to tell the compiler that "private"
methods are just that would solve this and other problems relatively
cleanly.  I'm not so enamored of C++'s "protected", but others feel it
would be a good idea as well.

Charles Allen                           Internet: cca@physics.purdue.edu
Department of Physics                   HEPnet:   purdnu::allen, fnal::cca
Purdue University                       Bitnet:   cca@fnal.bitnet
West Lafayette, IN  47907-1396          talknet:  317/494-9776