Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!unix.cis.pitt.edu!dsinc!syd
From: syd@DSI.COM (Syd Weinstein)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
Subject: Re: "bounce" vs "forward"
Message-ID: <1991Apr21.021454.6644@DSI.COM>
Date: 21 Apr 91 02:14:54 GMT
References: <3092@sparko.gwu.edu>
Reply-To: syd@DSI.COM
Distribution: na
Organization: Datacomp Systems, Inc.  Huntingdon Valley, PA
Lines: 13

wilhite@seas.gwu.edu (Robert Wilhite) writes:
>Was it intentional that the "bounce" command eliminate all header info
>referring to the original author (i.e., to make it appear that the
>"bouncer" is the original author)?  If not, would it be difficult to
>have the "bounce" code create a "Reply-To:" or "X-Author:" in the header?
Something sounds backwards here.  Bounce is supposed to make it
appear as if it came from the original author, not from the
bouncer.  (And it does for me...)  Thats the idea of it.
-- 
=====================================================================
Sydney S. Weinstein, CDP, CCP                   Elm Coordinator
Datacomp Systems, Inc.                          Voice: (215) 947-9900
syd@DSI.COM or dsinc!syd                        FAX:   (215) 938-0235