Xref: utzoo unix-pc.general:7580 unix-pc.uucp:382 comp.sys.3b1:1158
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!pacbell.com!tandem!zorch!hico2!sonyd1.Broadcast.Sony.COM!blilly.UUCP!bruce
From: bruce@balilly (Bruce Lilly)
Newsgroups: unix-pc.general,unix-pc.uucp,comp.sys.3b1
Subject: Re: Hardware Flow Control/19200 vs. 9600 baud connections
Message-ID: <1991Apr21.160738.29629@blilly.UUCP>
Date: 21 Apr 91 16:07:38 GMT
References: <1991Apr21.020111.28633@fithp>
Sender: usenet@blilly.UUCP (News Administrator)
Followup-To: comp.sys.3b1
Distribution: na
Organization: Bruce Lilly, Flushing, NY
Lines: 24
Nntp-Posting-Host: balilly

[ Followup set to comp.sys.3b1, since the other groups no longer exist... ]

In article <1991Apr21.020111.28633@fithp> mhw@fithp (Marc Weinstein) writes:
>[ ... ]
>So, we then changed our PC-to-modem connection to 9600 baud, and everything
>is working fine - no problems.  Our guess is that the port, and HFC, works
>reliably at 9600 baud.  The port rate becomes the limiting factor - since
>each end can only feed 9600 baud of data to the modem, there's never a
>danger of exceeding its capacity, or even of taxing HFC with a lot of actvity.
>Unfortunately, this means that the absolute highest transfer rate is 960 Bps,
>which we now see consistently using V.42bis between the modems.  Not bad, but
>not what we had hoped.

Some questions:
1)	were you using the built-in RS-232-C port (/dev/tty000), or an EIA or
	combo card?
2)	what loadable drivers are loaded, and in what order (run
	/etc/lddrv/lddrv -s")?
	"/etc/lddrv/lddrv -s")?
3)	have you tried transfers while other system activity was taking place,
	particularly while some large program was running (e.g. try switching
	windows a few times using shift-suspend or shift-resume)?
-- 
	Bruce Lilly		blilly!balilly!bruce@sonyd1.Broadcast.Sony.COM