Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!cs.umn.edu!ariel.unm.edu!triton.unm.edu!nwickham From: nwickham@triton.unm.edu (Neal C. Wickham) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy Subject: Re: NeXT Press Release Message-ID: <1991Apr19.220852.25083@ariel.unm.edu> Date: 19 Apr 91 22:08:52 GMT Article-I.D.: ariel.1991Apr19.220852.25083 References: <91dGsess1@cs.psu.edu> <47471@ut-emx.uucp> <4c9Go-jt1@cs.psu.edu> Distribution: comp Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque Lines: 42 In article <4c9Go-jt1@cs.psu.edu> melling@cs.psu.edu (Michael D Mellinger) writes: > > >The NeXT isn't that bad. Try running the Saturn demo, BoinkOut, and >BreakApp concurrently. I don't have the demos that came with the 86 >Amiga, so I can't compare. Although, I wouldn't be surprised if the >Amiga was a better animation machine. If games are what you want, the >A500 is definitely the way to go. It's much cheaper than the NeXT too. >Just don't try to run Unix on it. > >-Mike See, this is what bothers me most about NeXT. What is it for? Is it a workstation or a pc. If you want a good workstation... buy one. Buy a standard one that you can get plenty of software for. The advantage of an Amiga is that you get a lot of pc utility along with the Unix. For many people, it will have advantages over a plain workstation because of the Amiga OS and the Amiga software (including games). NeXT is in such a narrow nich, you don't get such an advantage. NeXT will never get the volume of software that is becoming available to Amiga because Amiga has a machine for the multitudes in the Amiga 500. What can you do on a NeXT that can't be done on a workstation? If you just want high end applications, why wouldn't you just want a sun or something that you can get software for? ...maybe I am missing something. By the way, the 500 is a powerful computer for only $500. And it is much much much much less expensive (cheaper) than a NeXT. The 500 and the UX compliment each other. The 500 is a good thing, not a bad one. And you know, ...gee, the NeXT is a good thing too. So is DP. DP may be a little like tail fins on cars... but what the heck. It is still a wonder- ful peice of programing and engineering. Pat Steve Jobs on the head for me. I don't see a lot of utility in DP however. DP is not something like multitasking where there is a 'trade off' in my opinion. And in general, the NeXT seems like some good work, good ideas, free enterprise in action. I don't see where there is market for the beast however and I still believe it is doomed. But lets not bicker about the NeXT failure... we will see. ^^^^ NCW