Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!mintaka!geech.gnu.ai.mit.edu!rjc
From: rjc@geech.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Ray Cromwell)
Subject: Re: NeXT/Amiga Flamage: Get a life.
Message-ID: <1991Apr21.000030.29913@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu>
Sender: news@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu
Organization: The Internet
References: <lm1Gzthu1@cs.psu.edu> <10906@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> <.=2Gtyju1@cs.psu.edu>
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 91 00:00:30 GMT
Lines: 24

In article <.=2Gtyju1@cs.psu.edu> melling@cs.psu.edu (Michael D Mellinger) writes:
>
>In article <10906@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> blissmer@expert.cc.purdue.edu (Kevin) writes:
>
>   This is not all-inclusive but includes most of the new features.  Anyone
>   more knowledgeable on Amiga OS 2.0 feel free to correct my amiga comments.
>
>Uh, some of us are more interested in how System 7.0 compares to the
>NeXT OS.  And could you leave out the ballon help?  I found it to be
>quite annoying.
>
>-Mike

 I'd take Any UNIX OS over System 7.0 simply because I have the
option of using a command shell,and the GUI isn't shoved in my face.
UNIX(BSD style Man pages) provide the best help I've ever seen.
I learned to program Unix simply by man-ing functions.
Emacs style Tex-info help is even better.

--
/ INET:rjc@gnu.ai.mit.edu     *   // The opinions expressed here do not      \
| INET:r_cromwe@upr2.clu.net  | \X/  in any way reflect the views of my self.|
\ UUCP:uunet!tnc!m0023        *                                              /