Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!yale!quasi-eli!cs.yale.edu!pharr-matthew
From: pharr-matthew@cs.yale.edu (Matthew Pharr)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Subject: Re: NeXT Press Release
Message-ID: <30285@cs.yale.edu>
Date: 21 Apr 91 16:42:52 GMT
References: <30178@cs.yale.edu> <11146@uwm.edu>
Sender: news@cs.yale.edu
Distribution: comp
Organization: Yale University Computer Science Dept., New Haven, CT 06520-2158
Lines: 14
Nntp-Posting-Host: rhino.zoo.cs.yale.edu
Originator: pharr@rhino.CS.Yale.Edu

In article <11146@uwm.edu> gblock@csd4.csd.uwm.edu writes:
>From article <30178@cs.yale.edu>, by pharr-matthew@cs.yale.edu (Matthew Pharr):
>> 
>> Says nothing. Having seen both quickdraw on a 68000 and DP on a 68040, I
>> can say that there is no question whatsoever that DP is way faster. True,
>> it would be awful on a 68000, but with a 68040, there's no problem.
>
>uhh, THAT says nothing.  You're comparing 68040 to 68000....  No deal.
>

I compared a 68040 to a 68000 because the person I was replying to claimed 
that 68000+QuickDraw is way faster than 68040 with DP.

matt