Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!ccwf.cc.utexas.edu
From: awessels@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Allen Wessels)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Subject: Re: NeXT Press Release
Message-ID: <47581@ut-emx.uucp>
Date: 21 Apr 91 18:53:27 GMT
References: <1o4G7xmu1@cs.psu.edu> <11230@uwm.edu> <672G.izu1@cs.psu.edu>
Sender: news@ut-emx.uucp
Reply-To: awessels@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Allen Wessels)
Distribution: comp
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin
Lines: 12

In article <672G.izu1@cs.psu.edu> melling@cs.psu.edu (Michael D Mellinger) writes:
>The megapixel display is a nice crisp 92dpi display, and there are
>times when you image an entire 8"1/2 by 11".  It only takes a split
>second.  Can there be that much of a difference when going from 92dpi
>to 300dpi?

Is this a serious question?  You HONESTLY can't figure out the difference
between a 68040 doing 92*92 res imaging and a 68000 doing 300*300?  (I'll admit
that the 92 dpi is greyscale (2 bit?).)  Also, I'd bet that the laserprinter
already has the page imaged in memory before the paper begins to feed.

Sheesh.