Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!caen!uwm.edu!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!gblock
From: gblock@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Gregory R Block)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Subject: Re: NeXT Press Release
Message-ID: <11299@uwm.edu>
Date: 22 Apr 91 23:29:35 GMT
References: <1991Apr22.065604.10532@neon.Stanford.EDU>
Sender: news@uwm.edu
Reply-To: gblock@csd4.csd.uwm.edu
Distribution: comp
Lines: 15
Originator: gblock@csd4.csd.uwm.edu

From article <1991Apr22.065604.10532@neon.Stanford.EDU>, by torrie@cs.stanford.edu (Evan Torrie):
> 
>   Any of the new Postscript engines using the AMD29000 (e.g. HP's
> new LaserJet) have integer performance comparable to that of the 68040.
> 

Yes, then again, PostScript is not entirely dependent on integer
performance.  Actually, from what I've seen, not much at all on
integer performace.

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All opinions are my own, and not those of my employer.
Why?  He doesn't know I'm doing this.
								-Wubba