Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!psuvax1!news
From: melling@cs.psu.edu (Michael D Mellinger)
Subject: Re: NeXT Press Release
In-Reply-To: greg@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu's message of 23 Apr 91 17:41:22 GMT
Message-ID: <gh5G0s+w1@cs.psu.edu>
Sender: news@cs.psu.edu (Usenet)
Nntp-Posting-Host: sunws5.sys.cs.psu.edu
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
References: <d!bGv+2s1@cs.psu.edu> <11145@uwm.edu> <91dGsess1@cs.psu.edu>
	<47471@ut-emx.uucp> <4c9Go-jt1@cs.psu.edu> <47555@ut-emx.uucp>
	<hpdG+zeu1@cs.psu.edu> <47641@ut-emx.uucp> <x#9Gwj4w1@cs.psu.edu>
	<47714@ut-emx.uucp>
Distribution: comp
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 91 21:41:45 GMT
Lines: 12


In article <47714@ut-emx.uucp> greg@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Greg Harp) writes:

   Sorry, but I've compiled quite a bit myself on both machines.  That 1+
   must have been severely crippled in order to compile _anything_ close to
   the speed of an 040 NeXT.  

What programs did you compile?  Compiling Objective C programs is
slow, but if it's standard C then the NeXT compiles pretty fast.

-Mike