Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!ccwf.cc.utexas.edu From: greg@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Greg Harp) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.applications Subject: Re: Help converting Kick2.0 for A2000 Message-ID: <47661@ut-emx.uucp> Date: 22 Apr 91 17:56:45 GMT References: <1292@screamer.csee.usf.edu> Sender: news@ut-emx.uucp Reply-To: greg@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Greg Harp) Organization: The University of Texas at Austin Lines: 19 In article bobl@graphics.rent.com (Bob Lindabury - SysAdm) writes: >stelmack@screamer.csee.usf.edu (Gregory M. Stelmack) writes: >If it was released for the 3000, it should have been released at the >same time for A500 and A2000 owners. I can't see how anyone can >justify it NOT being released to the others at the same time since >the 3000 just loads the image from disk anyway. It just goes to show >you that Commodore doesn't do things like the other companies. I >don't know if this is good or bad however. If it was good enough to >release in 3000's, why wasn't it good enough to release to the others? Well, for one thing the majority of Amigas are 1 meg machines. These machines don't have autoconfig memory in the right place for the ROM image. The actual percentage of machines that can run the betas of 2.0 is pretty small. -- Greg Harp |"I was there to match my intellect on national TV, | against a plumber and an architect, both with a PhD." greg@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu| -- "I Lost on Jeopardy," Weird Al Yankovic