Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!jarthur!rolee
From: rolee@jarthur.Claremont.EDU (Profess'nal Agitator)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc
Subject: WB2.0 question - BRU
Summary: BRU vs. commercial backup
Message-ID: <11839@jarthur.Claremont.EDU>
Date: 21 Apr 91 16:40:52 GMT
Organization: Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA 91711
Lines: 20

The WB2.0 bundle comes with BRU, Commodore's own backup utility.

How does this utility compare with commercial backup systems?  Are there any
features of BRU (good or bad) that particularly stand out?  Before I
acquired my A3000, I was using Quarterback with my A2000.  At this stage of
the game, I probably will still use QB since I have an extensive library of
QB'd disks.

But, I'd still like to know how BRU compares to the competition.
Quarterback?  Superback?  Other PD?

Agitator
  #->

 "Caltech -- A Division of      rolee@hmcvax.bitnet              //    BITNET
     Harvey Mudd"               rolee@jarthur.claremont.edu     //   InterNet
 -------------- R E M E M B E R   B E I J I N G ------------\\-//------------
 IBM PC - Who wants a politically correct computer?          \X/  Only AMIGA!
 ============================================================================
 Roderick Lee         "The Professional Agitator"         Harvey Mudd College