Xref: utzoo rec.music.synth:20763 comp.sys.atari.st:37405
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!midiline.UUCP!peter
From: peter%midiline.uucp@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov (Xorcist)
Newsgroups: rec.music.synth,comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: Cubase vs. Omega for ST???
Keywords: ST, sequencers
Message-ID: <qkuo11w164w@midiline>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 91 23:01:13 PDT
References: <1991Apr18.224006.18116@riacs.edu>
Organization: MIDILine BBS - Altadena, CA - (818) 797-3285

X-OR is NOT a multitasking tool with OMEGA as is CUBASE's MIDI MANAGER.
 
Although, OMEGA, I feel, is better then CUBASE. I've used both and 
CUBASE is a lot buggier then OMEGA and very sluggish. It's like 
working in jello. OMEGA is fast and direct.
 The only way to utilize XOR and OMEGA is to have 2 ATARI's. I'm going to 
try that soon.
 PS

s