Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!zazen!news From: pburke@vms.macc.wisc.edu (Peter Burke, MIC, 263-7744) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware Subject: Re: Boca vs. ATI vs. Paradise? - try Diamond SpeedSTAR Message-ID: <1991Apr23.202230.3518@macc.wisc.edu> Date: 23 Apr 91 20:11:25 GMT Sender: news@macc.wisc.edu (USENET News System) Distribution: usa Organization: University of Wisconsin Academic Computing Center Lines: 26 In article <1991Apr23.142322.27048@cbnewsc.att.com>, tjr@cbnewsc.att.com (thomas.j.roberts) writes... > >... I use a Diamond SpeedSTAR video card (SVGA, non-interlaced >1024x768, etc.) with a Gateway2000 33 MHz 386 - it is VERY FAST in >Windows 3.0. It uses the Tseng Labs ET4000 chip set, and can use >72 Hz vert sync for 640x480 and 800x600 modes (NO FLICKER!). >Note that the SpeedSTAR card comes with appropriate fonts so that text >is 10-point no matter what resolution you use (640x480, 800x600, 1024x768); >icons remain 32x32, and get smaller for higher resolutions, but that is not >a serious problem even at 1024x768 on a Sony 1304 14" monitor. Diamond also >has a BBS to support their products - A GREAT SERVICE! > >If this sounds like a recommendation of the SpeedSTAR, it is - I am >tremendously impressed with it, and their service (I have no connection >to Diamond, other than as a very satisfied customer). I am grateful to >Gateway2000 for selecting this card for their systems (I had expected >to need to buy another SVGA board to get top-quality features). > I can support this statement. Among the 20 PCs we have in our showroom for campus sales the best video performance is clearly on the (locally built) machine that sports a Diamond Speedstar card. It clearly outperforms IBM's 8514A in the high resolution modes, just as it runs circles around the Prodesigner II. I cannot understand the recent test results in PC Week - all other tests showed that the Speedstar war far better than the competition (even co-processed cards).