Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!ucbvax!agate!headcrash.Berkeley.EDU!dburr
From: dburr@headcrash.Berkeley.EDU (Donald Burr)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps
Subject: Re: WriteNow 2.2/Classic incompatibility
Message-ID: <1991Apr19.075024.14245@agate.berkeley.edu>
Date: 19 Apr 91 07:50:24 GMT
References: <1991Apr19.170835.3504@waikato.ac.nz>
Sender: root@agate.berkeley.edu (Charlie Root)
Organization: ucb
Lines: 28

In article <1991Apr19.170835.3504@waikato.ac.nz> phil@waikato.ac.nz writes:
>I may have missed the discussion on the following, as I haven't read this group
>for a while, so apologies if this is a repetition of what has gone before...
>
>As far as I can determine, WriteNow 2.2 does not work on a Classic.  Does
>anyone know what, if anything, T/Maker plan to do about it, or if there is
>already a free upgrade to a bug fix version?  It would seem to be a sensible
>thing to provide, since an entry level WP isn't much good if it won't run on an
>entry-level computer...
>
>I have tried WN 2.2 on other Mac models running System 6.0.7 without any
>problems, BTW.
>-- 
>Phil Etheridge (phil@waikato.ac.nz)              Phax:  +64 +71 384 155
>Computer Services/Mathematics & Statistics       Phone: +64 +71 568 299 x 8339
>University of Waikato, Hamilton, NZ.                I'd rather be MTBing


Really?  WriteNow is incompatible with the Classic?  I've run both WriteNow
2.0 and 2.2 on my 4meg Classic, under both System 6.0.7 and 7.0b1/b4, using
just about every diferent kind of INIT configuration, and haven't had any
problems with it.

What, specifically, are the incompatibilities you mention?
=======================================================================
Donald Burr; Univ of California, Berkeley | America Online: DonaldBurr
INTERNET: dburr@ocf.Berkeley.EDU          |_Compu$erve:_72540,3071____________
      or: 72540.3071@compuserve.COM       |    "Send flames to /dev/null."