Xref: utzoo comp.sys.misc:3333 sci.engr:1042 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!jarthur!nntp-server.caltech.edu!josephc From: josephc@nntp-server.caltech.edu (Simplelogic (Joseph)) Newsgroups: comp.sys.misc,sci.engr Subject: 74LS is too slow. Maybe? Summary: Is 74LS series TTL Logic too slow nowadays? Keywords: 74LS TTL Logic Computer Design Timing Message-ID: <1991Apr23.013116.3769@nntp-server.caltech.edu> Date: 23 Apr 91 01:31:16 GMT Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena Lines: 43 Hello fellow netters. I am currently putting together a NEC V-53 computer project. Basically speaking, a high-performance Intel 80186-like processor with what I hope is zero-wait-state memory, all clocking at a nice and decent 16-MHz. According to the documentation that I have, the V-53 requires a 80ns access time to memory. That's not too bad of a problem if the CPU was attached directly to the DRAM's (will be using -70ns SIMM's); however, in order to implement direct-fly-by DMA (where the device puts the data on the data bus while the memory writes it in, or vice-versa), I need to buffer the output of the CPU, and the memory, and run them both through the system bus (with expansion, of course). My problem is that a couple of 74LS gates will already add up to about 40ns to the access time... Ergo, wait states - something that I don't want to have if I can get away without it. How have current 386 and 68040 (and other) based systems get around this timing bottle-neck? 74F/74ALS series chips? Unfortunately, there is a very limited availability, both in terms of what's being manufactured, and in terms of sourcing from distributors in small quanitities. I'd like some input as to how I can speed up overall access time while maintaining a fully-buffered architecture (crucial because it will be on a bus with lots of device on it). Thanks. -- Joseph (P.S., if anyone is curious, I am building a telephone exchange using National Semiconductor's SLIM units which basically will take care of 80% of the interfacing and analog <-> digital conversion on one 'chip'. The system is on a S-100 sized backplane, but with completely redefined lines, and [heavens!] -48V DC and two -48V "AC" lines...) -- Joseph I. Chiu, Department of Computer Science, Calif. Inst. of Technology 1-57 Fleming House, Caltech, Pasadena 91126. (818) 585-0393 josephc@coil.caltech.edu ...I don't know what I don't know