Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!cs.utexas.edu!chinacat!holston!barton
From: barton@holston.UUCP (Barton A. Fisk)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ncr
Subject: Re: NCR's 3000 series to replace towers???
Message-ID: <5907@holston.UUCP>
Date: 19 Apr 91 19:35:48 GMT
References: <5904@holston.UUCP> <391@wybbs.mi.org> <697@ncrsea.Seattle.NCR.COM>
Organization: Barton A. Fisk Inc.
Lines: 25

In article <697@ncrsea.Seattle.NCR.COM> dmdc@ncrsea.Seattle.NCR.COM (Dennis M. Dooley) writes:
>In article <391@wybbs.mi.org> sleepy@wybbs.UUCP (Mike Faber) writes:
>>In article <5904@holston.UUCP> barton@holston.UUCP (Barton A. Fisk) writes:
>>>In article <nolan.670834286@helios> nolan@helios.unl.edu writes:
>>>
>>>Do the high end (ie. 3400 and >) support symetric multiprocessing?
>>

[NCR 3000 info deleted]               


What bus is NCR going to go with on the high end 486/50 systems?

Proprietary buses tend to fly in the face of open systems in my
opinion. 

Maybe someone could comment on whether the MC bus will handle
multiple processors? Or is NCR thinking about EISA? I read a  
comment by an NCR marketing spokesman in PW where he stated that
one of the targets was the Systempro.
-- 
uucp: holston!barton
pseudo: barton@holston.UUCP