Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!udel!rochester!pt.cs.cmu.edu!o.gp.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!ls1i+
From: ls1i+@andrew.cmu.edu (Leonard John Schultz)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next
Subject: Re: NextStation vs. NextStation color
Message-ID: <4c56CcC00Uh7I2Q7A2@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: 23 Apr 91 16:41:12 GMT
References: <wc1TnQa00VoRA4ZHxy@andrew.cmu.edu>,
	<1489@toaster.SFSU.EDU>
Organization: Class of '92, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Lines: 15
In-Reply-To: <1489@toaster.SFSU.EDU>

On 23-Apr-91 in Re: NextStation vs. NextSta..
user Eric P. Scott@toaster.SF writes:
>>Exactly how much slower is the display on the NextStation color?
> 
>3-4 times slower than the NeXTstation--which is damn good
>considering how much more memory we're talking about.

Eric,

Where do you see a factor of 3-4 performance degradation in the
ColorStation?  I have done much work on both machine and see NO
NOTICABLE DIFFERENCE in speed!!!  What exactly are you doing that seems
so slow?

Len