Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!sci34hub!gary
From: gary@sci34hub.sci.com (Gary Heston)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.novell
Subject: Re: netware 2.2 and windows
Keywords: netware, windows
Message-ID: <1991Apr20.000544.19476@sci34hub.sci.com>
Date: 20 Apr 91 00:05:44 GMT
References: <1046@opus.NMSU.Edu> <1991Apr18.014818.26707@npd.Novell.COM>
Reply-To: gary@sci34hub.sci.com (Gary Heston)
Organization: SCI Technology, Inc., Huntsville, Al.
Lines: 19

In article <1991Apr18.014818.26707@npd.Novell.COM> jlamb@seneca.npd.Novell.COM (Jason "Nematode" Lamb) writes:
>2.2 is always better to go with because of improvements in general to the
>OS. So go with 2.2. Non-Dedicated File Servers are always rotten bets, but
>if they insist, they will be able to run Windows on the server ONLY in Real
>Mode. It is advised you explore whether or not Real Mode will be enough for
>whatever applications they will want to run on the non-dedicated server.

If they insist on a non-dedicated server, they'll have to use 2.15. 
Netware 2.2 does not support non-dedicated configurations. Neither 
does 3.x. (Just finished up a couple of seminars on NetWare today.)

I agree a non-dedicated server is a rotten bet--even if the server is
a 10MHz 286 with a 30MB drive, it's better to have it dedicated.

-- 
Gary Heston   System Mismanager and technoflunky   uunet!sci34hub!gary or
My opinions, not theirs.    SCI Systems, Inc.       gary@sci34hub.sci.com
I support drug testing. I believe every public official should be given a
shot of sodium pentathol and ask "Which laws have you broken this week?".