Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!kuhub.cc.ukans.edu!caen!hellgate.utah.edu!fcom.cc.utah.edu!npd.novell.com!newsun!keith
Newsgroups: comp.sys.novell
Subject: Re: netware 2.2 and windows
Message-ID: <1991Apr20.234700.17404@novell.com>
From: keith@ca.excelan.com (Keith Brown)
Date: 21 Apr 91 01:34:36 CDT
Sender: news@novell.com (
Keywords: netware, windows
Lines: 28

The News Manager)
Nntp-Posting-Host: ca
Reply-To: keith@ca.excelan.com (Keith Brown)
Organization: Novell, Inc. San Jose, California
References: <1046@opus.NMSU.Edu> <1991Apr18.014818.26707@npd.Novell.COM> <1991Apr20.000544.19476@sci34hub.sci.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 1991 23:47:00 GMT

In article <1991Apr20.000544.19476@sci34hub.sci.com> gary@sci34hub.sci.com (Gary Heston) writes:
>If they insist on a non-dedicated server, they'll have to use 2.15. 
>Netware 2.2 does not support non-dedicated configurations. Neither 
>does 3.x. (Just finished up a couple of seminars on NetWare today.)
>

Who delivered this seminar? NetWare 2.2 *can* run non-dedicated.

In my opinion, NetWare 2.2's best new feature is the massive simplification
of its packaging. Whereas before there was SFT NetWare, Advanced NetWare,
NetWare ELS levels I and II and probably others that I'm not aware of, now
there is only NetWare 2.2 in 5, 10, 50 and 100 user versions. The 4 versions
are identical in every respect other then the number of users supported
and each version can be installed as either dedicated or non-dedicated (you
make the choice at installation time).

Installing the 100 user version of NetWare 2.2 as non-dedicated probably
isn't such a smart idea but then I'm a NetWare v3.X type, so what do I know :-)

-
Keith Brown                                      Phone: (408) 473 8308
Novell San Jose Development Centre               Fax:   (408) 433 0775
2180 Fortune Dr, San Jose, California 95131      Net:   keith@novell.COM