Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!pacbell.com!iggy.GW.Vitalink.COM!widener!msi.umn.edu!vixvax.mgi.com!cepek From: cepek@vixvax.mgi.com Newsgroups: comp.terminals Subject: Re: How many characters after Cntl-S? Message-ID: <1991Apr22.093735.938@vixvax.mgi.com> Date: 22 Apr 91 14:37:34 GMT References: <1991Apr18.152749.8762@cbnewsk.att.com> <189@blars> Distribution: usa Organization: Management Graphics, Inc. Lines: 33 In article <189@blars>, blarson@blars writes: > In article <1991Apr18.152749.8762@cbnewsk.att.com> > dennis@cbnewsk.att.com (dennis.seipel) writes: >>I am developing a DCE and want to know an acceptable number of character >>that a DCE may transmit after the DTE sends XOFF flow control. : >>Is there >>a standard for this or can anyone refer me to a study of what terminal >>manufactures typically design for? : > In other words, most equiptment will let you send some characters > after it sends the xoff. : > Check the manuals of the equiptment in question if you care, but don't > expect to find this info, it's rarly there. Sure enough, I went to check my manuals, and couldn't find it! :-| I recall that for either the WYSE 85 terminal (VT220 comp.) or the DataSouth 180(+) printer there was some statement about being rather tolerant during this form of handshaking. Something about sending XOFF when the buffer was x% full, then another when the buffer was really full. I even think that x was user selectable. BUT, I would NOT suggest relying on "tolerant" equipment on the other end. I bring this up to make people aware of this variation on the theme. The recommendations from blarson seem sound to me. ,---------------------------------,___________________________ / Mike Cepek, Programmer/Analyst / Internet: CEPEK@MGI.COM / \ Management Graphics, Inc. \ Voice: +1 612/851-6112 \ "Engage." / 1401 East 79th Street / Operator: +1 612/854-1220 / \ Minneapolis, MN 55425 USA \ Fax: +1 612/854-6913 \ `--------------------------------/___________________________/