Xref: utzoo rec.arts.sf-lovers:58463 rec.arts.fine:280 comp.editors:3038 comp.text:8292 rec.arts.books:21044 rec.arts.poems:11592 bit.listserv.literary:578 alt.prose:993 Path: utzoo!utgpu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!olivea!mintaka!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!mcsun!ukc!canon!wachtel From: wachtel@canon.co.uk (Tom Wachtel) Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf-lovers,rec.arts.fine,comp.editors,comp.text,rec.arts.books,rec.arts.poems,bit.listserv.literary,alt.prose Subject: Re: What do writers want from a word processor? Message-ID: <1991Apr19.072632.24092@canon.co.uk> Date: 19 Apr 91 07:26:32 GMT References: <1991Apr17.175001.8402@sjuphil.uucp> <1991Apr18.003213.11557@nntp-server.caltech.edu> Organization: Canon Research Europe, Guildford, UK Lines: 15 palmer@nntp-server.caltech.edu (David Palmer) writes: >Do you sense a sort of trend to these features? It should be impossible >to lose text unless you throw all of your disks down a garbage >disposal. On the other hand, it would be very useful to have a feature which deletes everything twice a day, except for things you think about from time to time, no? :) -- Tom Wachtel (wachtel@canon.co.uk)