Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!apple!uokmax!d.cs.okstate.edu!drd!mark
From: mark@drd.com (Mark Lawrence)
Newsgroups: comp.text.desktop
Subject: Re: UNIX desktop pub.
Keywords: Interleaf, Frame?, compare
Message-ID: <1991Apr18.191058.7016@drd.com>
Date: 18 Apr 91 19:10:58 GMT
References: <2325@abcom.ATT.COM> <1991Apr18.144145.1820@aplcen.apl.jhu.edu>
Organization: DRD Corporation
Lines: 24

>In article <2325@abcom.ATT.COM> brr@abcom.ATT.COM (Rao) writes:
>>I would like to get some info on Framemaker (is that the right
>>name?) and Interleaf, or any other similar products for
>>UNIX environments (say SUN sparc). I would like to know
>>how much it costs for single-user as well as
>>multi-user license.
>
In article <1991Apr18.144145.1820@aplcen.apl.jhu.edu> hall@aplcen (Marty Hall) writes:
>Frame themselves can give basic info on FrameMaker. Send email to
>"comments@frame.com". For comparisons to other products, you could try
>the FrameMaker user's mailing list: "framers@drd.com". Sending there
>will reflect to everyone on the list. If you also want to subscribe to
>the list, send to "framers-request@drd.com" (not to "framers" or you may
>need a flame-proof mbox :-). Framers is not entirely unbiased, of course,
>as they are mostly Frame users, but there are some Interleaf users
>(and ex-users) also.

I already responded to Rao's request for info.  I (I'm framers-request in
an alternate life) keep a file around (somewhat dated, but still, ya get 
what ya pay for ...) that contains these kinds of comparisons.  You can
respond to this article ('r' key for all you [t]rn users) if you like.
-- 
mark@drd.com
mark@jnoc.go.jp  $B!J%^!<%/!&%i%l%s%9!K(B  Nihil novum sub solem