Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!natinst!balkan!wrangler!bill
From: bill@wrangler.WLK.COM (Bill Kennedy)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: Summary: What's wrong with SCO
Message-ID: <658@wrangler.WLK.COM>
Date: 19 Apr 91 14:58:04 GMT
References: <1991Apr14.022153.2099@emisle.uucp> <1991Apr16.183342.10185@compu.com> <1991Apr18.191317.22136@ico.isc.com>
Reply-To: bill@wrangler.UUCP (Bill Kennedy)
Distribution: na
Organization: W.L. Kennedy Jr. & Associates, Pipe Creek, TX
Lines: 20

rcd@ico.isc.com (Dick Dunn) follows up:
fred@compu.com (Fred Rump) follows up:
dvb@emisle.uucp (David Van Beveren) writes about SCO:

Dick makes some points that most isn't necessarily best and generally IMHO
proves that sales volume doesn't guarantee superiority or applicability.
I'm only following up a couple of sentences, so I've deleted the rest.

>Look, the products from the various vendors have various advantages--
>nobody is an absolute stellar runaway or they'd have all the sales; nobody
>is abysmal or they'd be out of the business.

They _were_ out of business, maybe we need to find a silver stake and a
crossroads for a sure fix.
>-- 
>Dick Dunn     rcd@ico.isc.com -or- ico!rcd       Boulder, CO   (303)449-2870
>   ...While you were reading this, Motif grew by another kilobyte.
-- 
Bill Kennedy  uucp      {att,cs.utexas.edu,pyramid!daver}!ssbn.wlk.com!bill
              internet    bill@ssbn.WLK.COM   or ssbn!bill@attmail.COM